RegistryCompare › GraphRAG vs Qdrant

GraphRAG vs Qdrant

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of GraphRAG and Qdrant, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Qdrant leads on trust — 75.9/100 (Grade B) vs 74.3/100 (Grade B), a 1.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal GraphRAGmicrosoft/graphrag Qdrantqdrant/qdrant
HVTrust score 74.3 75.9
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #234 #199
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #11 #10
GitHub stars 36.0k 34.5k
Last updated 5d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 5.0 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 11k/wk 2.6M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.8 11.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 14.4 12.8
Maintenance / 20 15.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.3 19.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM) 1 — Qdrant
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Partial
Open in the live compare tool → GraphRAG profile Qdrant profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →