RegistryCompare › Graphiti vs ReMe

Graphiti vs ReMe

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Graphiti and ReMe, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

ReMe leads on trust — 89.7/100 (Grade A) vs 87.0/100 (Grade A), a 2.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Graphitigetzep/graphiti ReMeagentscope-ai/ReMe
HVTrust score 87.0 89.7
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #46 #16
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #3 #1
GitHub stars 30.9k 3.4k
Last updated 2d ago 2d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10 7.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 149k/wk 88k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.5 21.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.4 14.5
Maintenance / 20 18.2 18.9
Adoption / 20 17.7 15.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Graphiti profile ReMe profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →