Grafana MCP Server vs Terraform MCP Server
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Grafana MCP Server and Terraform MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Grafana MCP Server leads on trust — 65.0/100 (Grade B) vs 64.0/100 (Grade C), a 1.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Grafana MCP Servergrafana/mcp-grafana | Terraform MCP Serverhashicorp/terraform-mcp-server |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 65.0 | 64.0 |
| Evidence grade | B | C |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #228 | #252 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #69 | #80 |
| GitHub stars | 3.4k | 1.5k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.7 / 10 | 7.6 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 13.4 | 14.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.2 | 15.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.9 | 15.1 |
| Adoption / 20 | 8.5 | 7.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini | 1 — Google Gemini |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
Open in the live compare tool →
Grafana MCP Server profile
Terraform MCP Server profile
More MCP Servers →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →