RegistryCompare › Gitlab MCP vs Ha MCP

Gitlab MCP vs Ha MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Gitlab MCP and Ha MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Ha MCP leads on trust — 87.6/100 (Grade A) vs 87.3/100 (Grade A), a 0.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Gitlab MCPzereight/gitlab-mcp Ha MCPhomeassistant-ai/ha-mcp
HVTrust score 87.3 87.6
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #39 #32
Rank in MCP Servers #7 #5
GitHub stars 2.0k 4.6k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10 5.9 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 124k/wk 133k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.7 17.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.9 13.5
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 14.7 15.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Gitlab MCP profile Ha MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →