Registry › Compare › Gemini CLI vs Mistral Vibe

Gemini CLI vs Mistral Vibe

Mistral Vibe leads on trust: 84.4/100 (Grade A) against 77.3/100 (Grade B), a 7.1-point gap. Gemini CLI leads on maintenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence; Mistral Vibe leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance. Note: Mistral Vibe's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

B Gemini CLI 77.3

An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.

google-gemini/gemini-cli · #235 overall · #10 Coding Agents · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Gemini CLI if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+6.1Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago
+3.0Adoption: 108.7k GitHub stars against 5.4k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A Mistral Vibe 84.4

Minimal CLI coding agent by Mistral

mistralai/mistral-vibe · #108 overall · #6 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Mistral Vibe if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.6 against 4.7
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.6 against 4.7

Where they differ

10.9

Safety / IntegrityMistral Vibe +7.7

18.6

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceMistral Vibe +7.2

18.0

12.5

TransparencyMistral Vibe +0.8

13.3

20.0

MaintenanceGemini CLI +6.1

13.9

19.6

AdoptionGemini CLI +3.0

16.6

+3.5

Runtime calibrationMistral Vibe +0.5

+4.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Gemini CLI and Mistral Vibe, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Gemini CLIgoogle-gemini/gemini-cli	Mistral Vibemistralai/mistral-vibe
HVTrust score	77.3	84.4
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#235	#108
Rank in Coding Agents	#10	#6
GitHub stars	108.7k	5.4k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.7 / 10	5.6 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	446k/wk	525k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.9	18.6
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.5	13.3
Maintenance / 20	20.0	13.9
Adoption / 20	19.6	16.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Google Gemini	1 — Mistral AI
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	extensions	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Gemini CLI profile Mistral Vibe profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →