Registry › Compare › Gemini CLI vs Mistral Vibe

Gemini CLI vs Mistral Vibe

Mistral Vibe leads on trust: 86.6/100 (Grade A) against 76.0/100 (Grade B), a 10.6-point gap. Gemini CLI leads on maintenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence; Mistral Vibe leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance. Note: Mistral Vibe's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

B Gemini CLI 76.0

An open-source AI agent that brings the power of Gemini directly into your terminal.

google-gemini/gemini-cli · #209 overall · #10 Coding Agents · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Gemini CLI if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+2.9Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago
+2.6Adoption: 107.2k GitHub stars against 5k
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A Mistral Vibe 86.6

Minimal CLI coding agent by Mistral

mistralai/mistral-vibe · #59 overall · #7 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Mistral Vibe if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+8.1Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.2 against 4.7
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+1.3Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.2 against 4.7

Where they differ

10.9

Safety / IntegrityMistral Vibe +8.1

19.0

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceMistral Vibe +7.2

18.0

12.5

TransparencyMistral Vibe +1.3

13.8

18.9

MaintenanceGemini CLI +2.9

16.0

19.4

AdoptionGemini CLI +2.6

16.8

+3.5

Runtime calibrationGemini CLI +0.5

+3.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Gemini CLI and Mistral Vibe, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Gemini CLIgoogle-gemini/gemini-cli	Mistral Vibemistralai/mistral-vibe
HVTrust score	76.0	86.6
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#209	#59
Rank in Coding Agents	#10	#7
GitHub stars	107.2k	5.0k
Last updated	today	3d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.7 / 10	6.2 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	290k/wk	934k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.9	19.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.5	13.8
Maintenance / 20	18.9	16.0
Adoption / 20	19.4	16.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Google Gemini	1 — Mistral AI
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	extensions	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Gemini CLI profile Mistral Vibe profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →