RegistryCompare › Firecrawl vs Vibe-Trading

Firecrawl vs Vibe-Trading

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Firecrawl and Vibe-Trading, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Firecrawl leads on trust — 88.7/100 (Grade A) vs 62.2/100 (Grade C), a 26.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Firecrawlfirecrawl/firecrawl Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading
HVTrust score 88.7 62.2
Evidence grade A C
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #26 #221
Rank in Research & Data #2 #8
GitHub stars 182.8k 33.8k
Last updated today 2d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10 5.8 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Downloads 2.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.8 7.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.4 13.4
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 20.0 10.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 7 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, Groq, … 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Firecrawl profile Vibe-Trading profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →