RegistryCompare › Firecrawl vs Vibe-Trading

Firecrawl vs Vibe-Trading

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Firecrawl and Vibe-Trading, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Firecrawl leads on trust — 74.4/100 (Grade B) vs 62.6/100 (Grade C), a 11.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Firecrawlfirecrawl/firecrawl Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading
HVTrust score 74.4 62.6
Evidence grade B C
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #93 #263
Rank in Research & Data #4 #8
GitHub stars 163.2k 30.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10 5.1 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Downloads 2.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.5 8.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.4 12.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 10.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 7 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, Groq, … 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Firecrawl profile Vibe-Trading profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →