RegistryCompare › Firecrawl vs Unstructured

Firecrawl vs Unstructured

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Firecrawl and Unstructured, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Unstructured leads on trust — 86.1/100 (Grade A) vs 74.2/100 (Grade B), a 11.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Firecrawlfirecrawl/firecrawl UnstructuredUnstructured-IO/unstructured
HVTrust score 74.2 86.1
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #101 #44
Rank in Research & Data #4 #3
GitHub stars 167.3k 15.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10 6.7 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 2.2M/wk 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.4 20.9
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.3 14.2
Maintenance / 20 20.0 13.6
Adoption / 20 20.0 18.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 7 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, Groq, … 7 — Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Firecrawl profile Unstructured profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →