Firecrawl vs OpenScience
Firecrawl leads on trust: 88.0/100 (Grade A) against 82.4/100 (Grade A), a 5.6-point gap. Firecrawl leads on adoption and supply-chain integrity.
🔥 Supercharge your AI agents with data from the web and beyond. A web data API to search, scrape, and access more sources.
Choose Firecrawl if adoption and supply-chain integrity matter most.
- +6.4Adoption: 1.4M weekly downloads against 5.7k
- +1.7Safety / Integrity: 85% of recent commits signed, against 59%
The open-source AI workbench for scientific research
OpenScience doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Firecrawl and OpenScience, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Firecrawlfirecrawl/firecrawl | OpenSciencesynthetic-sciences/openscience |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.0 | 82.4 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #37 | #119 |
| Rank in Research & Data | #2 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 187.2k | 3.9k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.8 / 10 | 5.5 / 10 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 1.4M/wk | 6k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.0 | 17.3 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.4 | 13.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 20.0 | 13.6 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 7 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, Groq, … | 7 — Anthropic, Cohere, DeepSeek, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →