RegistryCompare › FastMCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

FastMCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP and FastMCP (TypeScript), two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 87.5/100 (Grade A) vs 80.4/100 (Grade A), a 7.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FastMCPPrefectHQ/fastmcp FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp
HVTrust score 80.4 87.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #104 #35
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #5 #2
GitHub stars 27.5k 3.3k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10 4.6 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 10.4M/wk 605k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.8 17.0
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.1 12.4
Maintenance / 20 19.7 19.0
Adoption / 20 20.0 16.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP profile FastMCP (TypeScript) profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →