Registry › Compare › FastMCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

FastMCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust: 87.4/100 (Grade A) against 81.1/100 (Grade A), a 6.3-point gap. FastMCP leads on transparency and adoption; FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.

A FastMCP 81.1

🚀 The fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients.

PrefectHQ/fastmcp · #145 overall · #9 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose FastMCP if transparency and adoption matter most.

+3.8Adoption: 13.3M weekly downloads against 707.1k
+1.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.6 against 4.5
+1.0Maintenance: last push today, against 2d ago

A FastMCP (TypeScript) 87.4

A TypeScript framework for building MCP servers.

punkpeye/fastmcp · #61 overall · #5 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose FastMCP (TypeScript) if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+4.9Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none

Where they differ

12.0

Safety / IntegrityFastMCP (TypeScript) +4.9

16.9

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceFastMCP (TypeScript) +7.2

18.0

13.3

TransparencyFastMCP +1.0

12.3

20.0

MaintenanceFastMCP +1.0

19.0

20.0

AdoptionFastMCP +3.8

16.2

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP and FastMCP (TypeScript), two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	FastMCPPrefectHQ/fastmcp	FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp
HVTrust score	81.1	87.4
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#145	#61
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#9	#5
GitHub stars	28.1k	3.3k
Last updated	today	2d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.6 / 10	4.5 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	13.3M/wk	707k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.0	16.9
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.3	12.3
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.0
Adoption / 20	20.0	16.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP profile FastMCP (TypeScript) profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →