Registry › Compare › FastMCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

FastMCP vs FastMCP (TypeScript)

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust: 87.5/100 (Grade A) against 80.9/100 (Grade A), a 6.6-point gap. FastMCP leads on transparency and adoption; FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.

A FastMCP 80.9

🚀 The fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients.

PrefectHQ/fastmcp · #150 overall · #10 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose FastMCP if transparency and adoption matter most.

+4.2Adoption: 13.7M weekly downloads against 351.2k
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.5 against 4.6
+0.7Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

A FastMCP (TypeScript) 87.5

A TypeScript framework for building MCP servers.

punkpeye/fastmcp · #61 overall · #5 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose FastMCP (TypeScript) if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+5.2Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none

Where they differ

11.9

Safety / IntegrityFastMCP (TypeScript) +5.2

17.1

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceFastMCP (TypeScript) +7.2

18.0

13.2

TransparencyFastMCP +0.8

12.4

20.0

MaintenanceFastMCP +0.7

19.3

20.0

AdoptionFastMCP +4.2

15.8

+5.0

Runtime calibrationFastMCP +0.1

+4.9

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP and FastMCP (TypeScript), two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	FastMCPPrefectHQ/fastmcp	FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp
HVTrust score	80.9	87.5
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#150	#61
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#10	#5
GitHub stars	28.2k	3.3k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	4.6 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	13.7M/wk	351k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.9	17.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.2	12.4
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.3
Adoption / 20	20.0	15.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP profile FastMCP (TypeScript) profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →