RegistryCompare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs ToolHive

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs ToolHive

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and ToolHive, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 87.0/100 (Grade A) vs 71.5/100 (Grade B), a 15.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp ToolHivestacklok/toolhive
HVTrust score 87.0 71.5
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #48 #292
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #3 #12
GitHub stars 3.3k 2.2k
Last updated 2d ago 2d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10 8.4 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 328k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.0 15.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.4 15.6
Maintenance / 20 18.7 19.9
Adoption / 20 15.8 8.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile ToolHive profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →