RegistryCompare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs ToolHive

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs ToolHive

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and ToolHive, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 86.9/100 (Grade A) vs 71.0/100 (Grade B), a 15.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp ToolHivestacklok/toolhive
HVTrust score 86.9 71.0
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B C
Overall rank #31 #185
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #2 #8
GitHub stars 3.3k 2.1k
Last updated 2d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10 8.1 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 523k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.3 15.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.4 15.4
Maintenance / 20 18.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.1 8.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile ToolHive profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →