Registry › Compare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs Pi MCP Adapter

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs Pi MCP Adapter

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust: 87.4/100 (Grade A) against 76.0/100 (Grade B), a 11.4-point gap. FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on provenance and supply-chain integrity; Pi MCP Adapter leads on maintenance and transparency.

A FastMCP (TypeScript) 87.4

A TypeScript framework for building MCP servers.

punkpeye/fastmcp · #50 overall · #4 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose FastMCP (TypeScript) if provenance and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+5.6Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none
+1.4Adoption: 745.4k weekly downloads against 278.1k

B Pi MCP Adapter 76.0

Token-efficient MCP adapter for Pi coding agent

nicobailon/pi-mcp-adapter · #211 overall · #8 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Pi MCP Adapter if maintenance and transparency matter most.

+1.1Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago
+0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.3 against 4.5

Where they differ

16.9

Safety / IntegrityFastMCP (TypeScript) +5.6

11.3

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceFastMCP (TypeScript) +7.2

10.8

12.3

TransparencyPi MCP Adapter +0.7

13.0

18.9

MaintenancePi MCP Adapter +1.1

20.0

16.3

AdoptionFastMCP (TypeScript) +1.4

14.9

+5.0

Runtime calibrationPi MCP Adapter +1.0

+6.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and Pi MCP Adapter, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp	Pi MCP Adapternicobailon/pi-mcp-adapter
HVTrust score	87.4	76.0
Evidence grade	A	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#50	#211
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#4	#8
GitHub stars	3.3k	1.6k
Last updated	3d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.5 / 10	5.3 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	745k/wk	278k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	16.9	11.3
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.3	13.0
Maintenance / 20	18.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	16.3	14.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile Pi MCP Adapter profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →