Registry › Compare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs mcpc

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs mcpc

Both are Grade A and 4.2 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on maintenance and adoption; mcpc leads on supply-chain integrity.

A FastMCP (TypeScript) 87.5

A TypeScript framework for building MCP servers.

punkpeye/fastmcp · #61 overall · #5 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose FastMCP (TypeScript) if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+4.1Adoption: 351.2k weekly downloads against 2.2k
+0.9Maintenance

A mcpc 83.3

The most compatible MCP CLI client. Supports: tools, resources, prompts, completions, async tasks, skills, stdio and streamable HTTP (MCP 2026-07-28 and 2025-11-25), persistent sessions, OAuth 2.1 with DCR, CIMD, client credentials, and ID-JAG, OS keychain, --json for code mode, grep for tool…

apify/mcpc · #117 overall · #8 Protocols & Tool Integration · coverage B (3/5)

Choose mcpc if supply-chain integrity matters most.

+0.8Safety / Integrity: 96% of recent commits signed, against 76%

Where they differ

17.1

Safety / Integritymcpc +0.8

17.9

12.4

TransparencyFastMCP (TypeScript) +0.1

12.3

19.3

MaintenanceFastMCP (TypeScript) +0.9

18.4

15.8

AdoptionFastMCP (TypeScript) +4.1

11.7

+4.9

Runtime calibrationmcpc +0.1

+5.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and mcpc, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp	mcpcapify/mcpc
HVTrust score	87.5	83.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#61	#117
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration	#5	#8
GitHub stars	3.3k	1.1k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.6 / 10	4.5 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	351k/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.1	17.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.4	12.3
Maintenance / 20	19.3	18.4
Adoption / 20	15.8	11.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile mcpc profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →