RegistryCompare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs mcpc

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs mcpc

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and mcpc, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 86.7/100 (Grade A) vs 81.3/100 (Grade A), a 5.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp mcpcapify/mcpc
HVTrust score 86.7 81.3
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #38 #85
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #3 #5
GitHub stars 3.3k 756
Last updated 1d ago 4d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10 4.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 523k/wk 1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.1 17.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.2 12.4
Maintenance / 20 19.0 17.1
Adoption / 20 16.1 11.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile mcpc profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →