RegistryCompare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs mcp-proxy

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs mcp-proxy

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and mcp-proxy, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FastMCP (TypeScript) leads on trust — 85.9/100 (Grade A) vs 81.1/100 (Grade A), a 4.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp mcp-proxysparfenyuk/mcp-proxy
HVTrust score 85.9 81.1
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #35 #58
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #3 #4
GitHub stars 3.2k 2.7k
Last updated today 15d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 5.8 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 523k/wk 292k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.4 17.2
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.5 13.4
Maintenance / 20 17.7 11.0
Adoption / 20 16.1 15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile mcp-proxy profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →