FAISS vs Weaviate
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FAISS and Weaviate, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
FAISS leads on trust — 75.5/100 (Grade B) vs 75.0/100 (Grade B), a 0.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | FAISSfacebookresearch/faiss | Weaviateweaviate/weaviate |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 75.5 | 75.0 |
| Evidence grade | B | B |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #88 | #91 |
| Rank in Memory & Knowledge | #7 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 40.7k | 16.7k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.1 / 10 | 6.7 / 10 |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Downloads | 3.9M/wk | 49.6M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 7.6 | 10.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.7 | 14.2 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.6 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 19.8 | 20.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | — | 1 — Weaviate |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | Unknown |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →