RegistryCompare › FAISS vs txtai

FAISS vs txtai

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FAISS and txtai, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

FAISS leads on trust — 100.0/100 (Grade A) vs 89.8/100 (Grade A), a 10.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FAISSfacebookresearch/faiss txtaineuml/txtai
HVTrust score 100.0 89.8
Evidence grade A A
Overall rank #9 #31
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #1 #3
GitHub stars 40.5k 12.7k
Last updated 2d ago 2d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 4.7 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 3.9M/wk 9k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 7.6 6.0
Identity & provenance / 20 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.7 12.5
Maintenance / 20 18.9 17.5
Adoption / 20 19.8 15.1
Open in the live compare tool → FAISS profile txtai profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.0 →