Registry › Compare › FAISS vs Mem0

FAISS vs Mem0

Mem0 leads on trust: 84.2/100 (Grade A) against 75.6/100 (Grade B), a 8.6-point gap. FAISS leads on transparency and maintenance; Mem0 leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.

B FAISS 75.6

A library for efficient similarity search and clustering of dense vectors.

facebookresearch/faiss · #247 overall · #12 Memory & Knowledge · coverage A (4/5)

Choose FAISS if transparency and maintenance matter most.

  • +3.9Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 4d ago
  • +0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.1 against 5.5
A Mem0 84.2

The Memory Layer for AI Agents - Drop-in memory infrastructure for AI agents and apps. Context that persists. Built for production.

mem0ai/mem0 · #108 overall · #10 Memory & Knowledge · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Mem0 if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

  • +11.8Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 0%
  • +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none

Where they differ

7.6
Safety / IntegrityMem0 +11.8
19.4
10.8
Identity / ProvenanceMem0 +7.2
18.0
13.7
TransparencyFAISS +0.5
13.2
19.8
MaintenanceFAISS +3.9
15.9
19.7
AdoptionFAISS +0.2
19.5
+4.0
Runtime calibrationFAISS +5.8
-1.8

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FAISS and Mem0, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal FAISSfacebookresearch/faiss Mem0mem0ai/mem0
HVTrust score 75.6 84.2
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #247 #108
Rank in Memory & Knowledge #12 #10
GitHub stars 41.3k 68.3k
Last updated 1d ago 4d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10 5.5 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 2.9M/wk 885k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 7.6 19.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.7 13.2
Maintenance / 20 19.8 15.9
Adoption / 20 19.7 19.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server — Implemented
External providers — 14 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface — plugins
Provenance drift Match Partial
Open in the live compare tool → FAISS profile Mem0 profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →