RegistryCompare › Evidently vs Langfuse

Evidently vs Langfuse

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Evidently and Langfuse, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Langfuse leads on trust — 78.2/100 (Grade B) vs 76.6/100 (Grade B), a 1.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Evidentlyevidentlyai/evidently Langfuselangfuse/langfuse
HVTrust score 76.6 78.2
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #80 #77
Rank in Observability & Evaluation #6 #5
GitHub stars 7.8k 32.9k
Last updated 7d ago today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10 6.5 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 337k/wk 6.9M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.1 12.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 11.3 14.0
Maintenance / 20 11.5 20.0
Adoption / 20 16.7 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 3 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenAI, Postgres 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Evidently profile Langfuse profile More Observability & Evaluation →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →