Registry › Compare › EverOS vs zvec-grep

EverOS vs zvec-grep

Both are Grade A and 0.2 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. EverOS leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption; zvec-grep leads on maintenance.

A EverOS 87.6

One portable memory layer for every AI agent: local-first, Markdown-native, user-owned, and self-evolving across apps, tools, and workflows.

EverMind-AI/EverOS · #66 overall · #4 Memory & Knowledge · coverage B (3/5)

Choose EverOS if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+1.3Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.0 against 5.6
+1.2Adoption: 3.9k weekly downloads against 3.6k
+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.0 against 5.6

A zvec-grep 87.4

Local-first search across your workspace, built for humans and AI agents.

zvec-ai/zvec-grep · #70 overall · #6 Memory & Knowledge · coverage B (3/5)

Choose zvec-grep if maintenance matters most.

+2.3Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

Where they differ

20.8

Safety / IntegrityEverOS +1.3

19.5

14.4

TransparencyEverOS +1.1

13.3

17.7

Maintenancezvec-grep +2.3

20.0

14.7

AdoptionEverOS +1.2

13.5

+2.0

Runtime calibrationzvec-grep +1.1

+3.1

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of EverOS and zvec-grep, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	EverOSEverMind-AI/EverOS	zvec-grepzvec-ai/zvec-grep
HVTrust score	87.6	87.4
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#66	#70
Rank in Memory & Knowledge	#4	#6
GitHub stars	13.8k	4.2k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.0 / 10	5.6 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	4k/wk	4k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.8	19.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.4	13.3
Maintenance / 20	17.7	20.0
Adoption / 20	14.7	13.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter	1 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → EverOS profile zvec-grep profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →