Registry › Compare › EverOS vs ReMe

EverOS vs ReMe

Both are Grade A and 0.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. EverOS leads on transparency and adoption; ReMe leads on maintenance.

A EverOS 88.2

One portable memory layer for every AI agent: local-first, Markdown-native, user-owned, and self-evolving across apps, tools, and workflows.

EverMind-AI/EverOS · #51 overall · #2 Memory & Knowledge · coverage B (3/5)

Choose EverOS if transparency and adoption matter most.

+0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.0 against 6.4
+0.5Adoption: 13.6k GitHub stars against 3.7k

A ReMe 88.3

ReMe: Memory Management Kit for Agents - Remember Me, Refine Me.

agentscope-ai/ReMe · #50 overall · #1 Memory & Knowledge · coverage B (3/5)

Choose ReMe if maintenance matters most.

+0.6Maintenance

Where they differ

20.7

Safety / IntegrityEverOS +0.2

20.5

14.4

TransparencyEverOS +0.5

13.9

18.5

MaintenanceReMe +0.6

19.1

14.8

AdoptionEverOS +0.5

14.3

+1.8

Runtime calibrationReMe +0.7

+2.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of EverOS and ReMe, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	EverOSEverMind-AI/EverOS	ReMeagentscope-ai/ReMe
HVTrust score	88.2	88.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#51	#50
Rank in Memory & Knowledge	#2	#1
GitHub stars	13.6k	3.7k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.0 / 10	6.4 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	5k/wk	20k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.7	20.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.4	13.9
Maintenance / 20	18.5	19.1
Adoption / 20	14.8	14.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter	2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → EverOS profile ReMe profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →