EverOS vs Graphiti
Both are Grade A and 0.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. EverOS leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Graphiti leads on maintenance and adoption.
One portable memory layer for every AI agent: local-first, Markdown-native, user-owned, and self-evolving across apps, tools, and workflows.
Choose EverOS if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +1.0Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 6.0
- +0.9Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 6.0
Build Real-Time Knowledge Graphs for AI Agents
Choose Graphiti if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +3.0Adoption: 194.5k weekly downloads against 5.4k
- +0.5Maintenance
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of EverOS and Graphiti, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | EverOSEverMind-AI/EverOS | Graphitigetzep/graphiti |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.1 | 87.7 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #48 | #56 |
| Rank in Memory & Knowledge | #1 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 13.4k | 31.8k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.1 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 5k/wk | 194k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.8 | 19.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.5 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 18.1 | 18.6 |
| Adoption / 20 | 14.9 | 17.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter | 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →