Registry › Compare › Engram vs Eve

Engram vs Eve

Eve leads on trust: 67.1/100 (Grade B) against 64.5/100 (Grade C), a 2.6-point gap. Eve leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

C Engram 64.5

Persistent memory system for AI coding agents. Agent-agnostic Go binary with SQLite + FTS5, MCP server, HTTP API, CLI, and TUI.

Gentleman-Programming/engram · #537 overall · #2 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Engram doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

B Eve 67.1

The Open Framework for Building Agents

vercel/eve · #449 overall · #1 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Eve if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+1.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.4
+1.3Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.9 against 4.4

Where they differ

10.5

Safety / IntegrityEve +1.9

12.4

12.2

TransparencyEve +1.3

13.5

9.3

AdoptionEngram +0.3

9.0

+1.7

Runtime calibrationEngram +0.3

+1.4

2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Engram and Eve, two Needs review projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	EngramGentleman-Programming/engram	Evevercel/eve
HVTrust score	64.5	67.1
Evidence grade	C	B
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#537	#449
Rank in Needs review	#2	#1
GitHub stars	7.5k	5.6k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.4 / 10	5.9 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.5	12.4
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.2	13.5
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	9.3	9.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	extensions
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Engram profile Eve profile More Needs review →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →