ECC vs oh-my-pi
ECC leads on trust: 91.0/100 (Grade A) against 83.3/100 (Grade A), a 7.7-point gap. ECC leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Choose ECC if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +5.2Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 18%
- +0.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.7 against 4.8
- +0.5Adoption: 295.7k GitHub stars against 37.6k
⌥ Coding agent with the IDE wired in. Built by Stencil Labs.
oh-my-pi doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ECC and oh-my-pi, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | ECCaffaan-m/ECC | oh-my-pican1357/oh-my-pi |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 91.0 | 83.3 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #18 | #116 |
| Rank in Coding Agents | #2 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 295.7k | 37.6k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.7 / 10 | 4.8 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 22k/wk | 352k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.6 | 14.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 12.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.9 | 18.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI | 5 — Anthropic, Firecrawl, Perplexity, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →