Registry › Compare › ECC vs Mistral Vibe

ECC vs Mistral Vibe

ECC leads on trust: 91.0/100 (Grade A) against 85.6/100 (Grade A), a 5.4-point gap. ECC leads on maintenance and adoption.

A ECC 91.0

The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.

affaan-m/ECC · #18 overall · #2 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Choose ECC if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+3.8Maintenance
+2.6Adoption: 295.7k GitHub stars against 5.3k
+1.1Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 80%

A Mistral Vibe 85.6

Minimal CLI coding agent by Mistral

mistralai/mistral-vibe · #90 overall · #6 Coding Agents · coverage B (3/5)

Mistral Vibe doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

19.6

Safety / IntegrityECC +1.1

18.5

19.9

MaintenanceECC +3.8

16.1

18.9

AdoptionECC +2.6

16.3

+1.3

Runtime calibrationMistral Vibe +2.1

+3.4

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Transparency 13.3 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ECC and Mistral Vibe, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	ECCaffaan-m/ECC	Mistral Vibemistralai/mistral-vibe
HVTrust score	91.0	85.6
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#18	#90
Rank in Coding Agents	#2	#6
GitHub stars	295.7k	5.3k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.7 / 10	5.6 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	22k/wk	319k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.6	18.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.3	13.3
Maintenance / 20	19.9	16.1
Adoption / 20	18.9	16.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	2 — Anthropic, OpenAI	1 — Mistral AI
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → ECC profile Mistral Vibe profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →