RegistryCompare › E2B vs OpenSandbox

E2B vs OpenSandbox

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of E2B and OpenSandbox, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

E2B leads on trust — 76.8/100 (Grade B) vs 25.8/100 (Grade D), a 51.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal E2Be2b-dev/e2b OpenSandboxopensandbox-group/OpenSandbox
HVTrust score 76.8 25.8
Evidence grade B D
Coverage grade A D
Overall rank #59 #384
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #1 #4
GitHub stars 13.0k 12.0k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 982k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.2 2.1
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.9 8.5
Maintenance / 20 19.6 19.9
Adoption / 20 17.9 9.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 1 — E2B 1 — Redis
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → E2B profile OpenSandbox profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →