Registry › Compare › DvalinCode vs Snyk Agent Scan

DvalinCode vs Snyk Agent Scan

DvalinCode leads on trust: 83.9/100 (Grade A) against 63.5/100 (Grade C), a 20.4-point gap. DvalinCode leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence; Snyk Agent Scan leads on adoption.

A DvalinCode 83.9

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #98 overall · #2 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose DvalinCode if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.7
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+1.6Maintenance
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.7

C Snyk Agent Scan 63.5

Security scanner for AI agents, MCP servers and agent skills.

snyk/agent-scan · #525 overall · #6 Security & Guardrails · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Snyk Agent Scan if adoption matters most.

+0.8Adoption: 3.1k GitHub stars against 118

Where they differ

20.0

Safety / IntegrityDvalinCode +7.9

12.1

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceDvalinCode +7.2

10.8

14.1

TransparencyDvalinCode +0.8

13.3

19.5

MaintenanceDvalinCode +1.6

17.9

7.6

AdoptionSnyk Agent Scan +0.8

8.4

+4.7

Runtime calibrationDvalinCode +3.7

+1.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DvalinCode and Snyk Agent Scan, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode	Snyk Agent Scansnyk/agent-scan
HVTrust score	83.9	63.5
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#98	#525
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#2	#6
GitHub stars	118	3.1k
Last updated	4d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.6 / 10	5.7 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	91/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.0	12.1
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.1	13.3
Maintenance / 20	19.5	17.9
Adoption / 20	7.6	8.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → DvalinCode profile Snyk Agent Scan profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →