Registry › Compare › DvalinCode vs REA

DvalinCode vs REA

DvalinCode leads on trust: 83.9/100 (Grade A) against 73.8/100 (Grade B), a 10.1-point gap. DvalinCode leads on maintenance and supply-chain integrity; REA leads on adoption.

A DvalinCode 83.9

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #98 overall · #2 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose DvalinCode if maintenance and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+6.8Maintenance: last push 4d ago, against 18d ago
+4.1Safety / Integrity: 85% of recent commits signed, against 45%
+1.4Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 4.9

B REA 73.8

Reverse engineer anything with agents, from app behavior down to native binaries.

morluto/rea · #246 overall · #4 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose REA if adoption matters most.

+1.2Adoption: 415 GitHub stars against 118

Where they differ

20.0

Safety / IntegrityDvalinCode +4.1

15.9

14.1

TransparencyDvalinCode +1.4

12.7

19.5

MaintenanceDvalinCode +6.8

12.7

7.6

AdoptionREA +1.2

8.8

+4.7

Runtime calibrationREA +1.0

+5.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DvalinCode and REA, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode	REAmorluto/rea
HVTrust score	83.9	73.8
Evidence grade	A	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#98	#246
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#2	#4
GitHub stars	118	415
Last updated	4d ago	18d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.6 / 10	4.9 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	91/wk	72/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.0	15.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.1	12.7
Maintenance / 20	19.5	12.7
Adoption / 20	7.6	8.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → DvalinCode profile REA profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →