Registry › Compare › DvalinCode vs REA

DvalinCode vs REA

REA leads on trust: 89.9/100 (Grade A) against 83.4/100 (Grade A), a 6.5-point gap. REA leads on maintenance and adoption.

A DvalinCode 83.4

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #127 overall · #4 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

DvalinCode doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A REA 89.9

Reverse engineer anything with agents, from app behavior down to native binaries.

morluto/rea · #30 overall · #2 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose REA if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+5.8Adoption: 447.4k GitHub stars against 120
+1.3Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago
+0.8Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 79%

Where they differ

19.9

Safety / IntegrityREA +0.8

20.7

14.3

TransparencyDvalinCode +0.2

14.1

18.7

MaintenanceREA +1.3

20.0

7.8

AdoptionREA +5.8

13.6

+4.7

Runtime calibrationDvalinCode +1.2

+3.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DvalinCode and REA, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode	REAmorluto/rea
HVTrust score	83.4	89.9
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#127	#30
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#4	#2
GitHub stars	120	447.4k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.8 / 10	6.6 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	135/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.9	20.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.3	14.1
Maintenance / 20	18.7	20.0
Adoption / 20	7.8	13.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → DvalinCode profile REA profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →