Registry › Compare › DvalinCode vs HOL Guard

DvalinCode vs HOL Guard

HOL Guard leads on trust: 92.2/100 (Grade A) against 84.8/100 (Grade A), a 7.4-point gap. HOL Guard leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A DvalinCode 84.8

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #87 overall · #2 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

DvalinCode doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A HOL Guard 92.2

Open-source antivirus for AI agents: block risky tools, secret access, prompt injection, malicious packages, MCP servers, plugins, and skills at runtime.

hashgraph-online/hol-guard · #7 overall · #1 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose HOL Guard if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.4Safety / Integrity: 98% of recent commits signed, against 85%
+3.6Adoption: 9.1k weekly downloads against 401
+2.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 9.6 against 6.6
+0.5Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago

Where they differ

20.0

Safety / IntegrityHOL Guard +4.4

24.4

14.1

TransparencyHOL Guard +2.6

16.7

19.5

MaintenanceHOL Guard +0.5

20.0

8.5

AdoptionHOL Guard +3.6

12.1

+4.7

Runtime calibrationDvalinCode +3.7

+1.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DvalinCode and HOL Guard, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode	HOL Guardhashgraph-online/hol-guard
HVTrust score	84.8	92.2
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#87	#7
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#2	#1
GitHub stars	120	684
Last updated	3d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.6 / 10	9.6 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	401/wk	9k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.0	24.4
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.1	16.7
Maintenance / 20	19.5	20.0
Adoption / 20	8.5	12.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → DvalinCode profile HOL Guard profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →