Registry › Compare › DvalinCode vs HOL Guard

DvalinCode vs HOL Guard

HOL Guard leads on trust: 91.3/100 (Grade A) against 83.7/100 (Grade A), a 7.6-point gap. HOL Guard leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A DvalinCode 83.7

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #121 overall · #4 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

DvalinCode doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A HOL Guard 91.3

Open-source antivirus and firewall for AI agents: block risky tools, secret access, prompt injection, malicious packages, MCP servers, plugins, and skills at runtime.

hashgraph-online/hol-guard · #18 overall · #2 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose HOL Guard if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.0Adoption: 6.8k weekly downloads against 331
+3.7Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 79%
+1.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 8.8 against 6.7
+0.9Maintenance: last push today, against 2d ago

Where they differ

19.8

Safety / IntegrityHOL Guard +3.7

23.5

14.2

TransparencyHOL Guard +1.8

16.0

19.1

MaintenanceHOL Guard +0.9

20.0

8.4

AdoptionHOL Guard +4.0

12.4

+4.2

Runtime calibrationDvalinCode +2.8

+1.4

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DvalinCode and HOL Guard, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode	HOL Guardhashgraph-online/hol-guard
HVTrust score	83.7	91.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#121	#18
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#4	#2
GitHub stars	121	1.1k
Last updated	2d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.7 / 10	8.8 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	331/wk	7k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.8	23.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.2	16.0
Maintenance / 20	19.1	20.0
Adoption / 20	8.4	12.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	2 — Anthropic, Tavily	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	extensions
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → DvalinCode profile HOL Guard profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →