Registry › Compare › DSH TUI vs Larksuite Cli

DSH TUI vs Larksuite Cli

Both are Grade A and 4.6 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. DSH TUI leads on maintenance; Larksuite Cli leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

A DSH TUI 84.5

DSH's officially top-recommended TUI plugin — high performance, low overhead, cute pixel whale, smooth mouse interaction. One-command install via npm. / DSH 官方首推的 TUI 插件，高性能低占用，可爱像素鲸鱼，流畅鼠标交互，npm 一键安装

ccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI · #16 overall · #16 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose DSH TUI if maintenance matters most.

+2.8Maintenance: last push today, against 2d ago

A Larksuite Cli 89.1

The official Lark/飞书 CLI tool, maintained by the larksuite team — built for humans and AI Agents. Covers core business domains including Messenger, Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar, Mail, Tasks, Meetings, and more, with 200+ commands and 20+ AI Agent Skills.

larksuite/cli · #5 overall · #5 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Larksuite Cli if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+2.7Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 94%
+2.4Adoption: 229.3k weekly downloads against 19.2k
+1.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.1 against 4.2

Where they differ

17.4

Safety / IntegrityLarksuite Cli +2.7

20.1

12.1

TransparencyLarksuite Cli +1.6

13.7

20.0

MaintenanceDSH TUI +2.8

17.2

15.0

AdoptionLarksuite Cli +2.4

17.4

+2.0

Runtime calibrationLarksuite Cli +0.7

+2.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DSH TUI and Larksuite Cli, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DSH TUIccch1mneyyy/dsh-TUI	Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli
HVTrust score	84.5	89.1
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#16	#5
Rank in Agent Skills	#16	#5
GitHub stars	7.7k	18.1k
Last updated	today	2d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.2 / 10	6.1 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	19k/wk	229k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.4	20.1
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.1	13.7
Maintenance / 20	20.0	17.2
Adoption / 20	15.0	17.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	—
External providers	2 — Anthropic, DeepSeek	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → DSH TUI profile Larksuite Cli profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →