Docling vs WrenAI
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Docling and WrenAI, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Docling leads on trust — 89.2/100 (Grade A) vs 86.1/100 (Grade A), a 3.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Doclingdocling-project/docling | WrenAICanner/WrenAI |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.2 | 86.1 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #17 | #46 |
| Rank in Research & Data | #1 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 65.9k | 17.5k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.2 / 10 | 5.7 / 10 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 585k/wk | 89/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.5 | 19.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.9 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 18.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 19.3 | 12.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — OpenAI | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Postgres |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →