RegistryCompare › Docling vs Unstructured

Docling vs Unstructured

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Docling and Unstructured, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Docling leads on trust — 86.7/100 (Grade A) vs 84.1/100 (Grade A), a 2.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Doclingdocling-project/docling UnstructuredUnstructured-IO/unstructured
HVTrust score 86.7 84.1
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #23 #42
Rank in Research & Data #1 #3
GitHub stars 63.4k 15.2k
Last updated 2d ago 4d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10 6.7 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 4.1M/wk 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.8 20.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.6 14.2
Maintenance / 20 19.9 13.5
Adoption / 20 20.0 18.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 3 — Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI, Postgres 6 — Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI, Pinecone, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Docling profile Unstructured profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →