RegistryCompare › Docling vs OpenScience

Docling vs OpenScience

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Docling and OpenScience, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Docling leads on trust — 88.5/100 (Grade A) vs 78.7/100 (Grade B), a 9.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Doclingdocling-project/docling OpenSciencesynthetic-sciences/openscience
HVTrust score 88.5 78.7
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade A B
Overall rank #21 #69
Rank in Research & Data #1 #4
GitHub stars 65.0k 3.3k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 4.7 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 4.1M/wk 3k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.7 15.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.5 12.5
Maintenance / 20 19.7 19.9
Adoption / 20 20.0 13.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 1 — OpenAI 7 — Anthropic, Cohere, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Docling profile OpenScience profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →