Registry › Compare › Docling vs OpenScience

Docling vs OpenScience

Docling leads on trust: 89.6/100 (Grade A) against 82.3/100 (Grade A), a 7.3-point gap. Docling leads on adoption and supply-chain integrity, and rests on broader evidence.

A Docling 89.6

Get your documents ready for gen AI

docling-project/docling · #23 overall · #1 Research & Data · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Docling if adoption and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+5.8Adoption: 755.8k weekly downloads against 5.7k
+1.6Safety / Integrity: 95% of recent commits signed, against 56%
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A OpenScience 82.3

The open-source AI workbench for scientific research

synthetic-sciences/openscience · #118 overall · #5 Research & Data · coverage B (3/5)

OpenScience doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

18.8

Safety / IntegrityDocling +1.6

17.2

12.9

TransparencyOpenScience +0.3

13.2

19.4

AdoptionDocling +5.8

13.6

+0.5

Runtime calibrationDocling +0.2

+0.3

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Docling and OpenScience, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Doclingdocling-project/docling	OpenSciencesynthetic-sciences/openscience
HVTrust score	89.6	82.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#23	#118
Rank in Research & Data	#1	#5
GitHub stars	68.3k	3.9k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.2 / 10	5.5 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	756k/wk	6k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.8	17.2
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.9	13.2
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	19.4	13.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	1 — OpenAI	7 — Anthropic, Cohere, DeepSeek, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Unknown	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Docling profile OpenScience profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →