Registry › Compare › Dify vs Hypit

Dify vs Hypit

Both are Grade B and 3.7 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Dify leads on transparency and adoption, and rests on broader evidence; Hypit leads on provenance.

B Dify 79.3

Build Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.

langgenius/dify · #158 overall · #4 Workflow Platforms · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Dify if transparency and adoption matter most.

+5.4Transparency
+4.5Adoption: 24.3M weekly downloads against 10k
+2.9Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 49%
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

B Hypit 75.6

Clone any viral video with AI agents. Not just a script, the whole workflow: swap the face, the words, the B-roll, ship 100 variants in one command, and get your 100M views.

hypit-ai/hypit · #217 overall · #6 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Hypit if provenance matters most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none

Where they differ

12.9

Safety / IntegrityDify +2.9

10.0

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceHypit +7.2

18.0

13.9

TransparencyDify +5.4

8.5

20.0

MaintenanceDify +0.1

19.9

20.0

AdoptionDify +4.5

15.5

+1.7

Runtime calibrationHypit +2.0

+3.7

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Dify and Hypit, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Difylanggenius/dify	Hypithypit-ai/hypit
HVTrust score	79.3	75.6
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#158	#217
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#4	#6
GitHub stars	157.5k	17.5k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.3 / 10	—
License	NOASSERTION	NOASSERTION
Downloads	24.3M/wk	10k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.9	10.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.9	8.5
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.9
Adoption / 20	20.0	15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Partial	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Dify profile Hypit profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →