Registry › Compare › Dify vs Hypit

Dify vs Hypit

Dify leads on trust: 75.5/100 (Grade B) against 67.5/100 (Grade B), a 8.0-point gap. Dify leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

B Dify 75.5

Build Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.

langgenius/dify · #265 overall · #5 Workflow Platforms · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Dify if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 19%
+3.7Adoption: 26.0M weekly downloads against 15k
+3.6Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

B Hypit 67.5

Clone any viral video with AI agents. Not just a script, the whole workflow: swap the face, the words, the B-roll, ship 100 variants in one command, and get your 100M views.

hypit-ai/hypit · #451 overall · #8 Workflow Platforms · coverage B (3/5)

Hypit doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

11.2

Safety / IntegrityDify +4.0

7.2

20.0

MaintenanceDify +3.6

16.4

20.0

AdoptionDify +3.7

16.3

+0.7

Runtime calibrationHypit +3.3

+4.0

2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Transparency 12.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Dify and Hypit, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Difylanggenius/dify	Hypithypit-ai/hypit
HVTrust score	75.5	67.5
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#265	#451
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#5	#8
GitHub stars	161.2k	29.9k
Last updated	today	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	5.0 / 10	5.0 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	NOASSERTION
Downloads	26.0M/wk	15k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.2	7.2
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.8	12.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	16.4
Adoption / 20	20.0	16.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Partial	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Dify profile Hypit profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →