RegistryCompare › DeerFlow vs Vibe-Trading

DeerFlow vs Vibe-Trading

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DeerFlow and Vibe-Trading, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

DeerFlow leads on trust — 67.1/100 (Grade B) vs 63.5/100 (Grade C), a 3.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal DeerFlowbytedance/deer-flow Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading
HVTrust score 67.1 63.5
Evidence grade B C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #186 #266
Rank in Research & Data #5 #7
GitHub stars 80.0k 30.8k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10 5.5 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.0 8.7
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.9 13.2
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 11.8 10.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 6 — E2B, OpenAI, OpenRouter, … 3 — DeepSeek, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → DeerFlow profile Vibe-Trading profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →