DeerFlow vs Vibe-Trading
DeerFlow leads on trust: 67.2/100 (Grade B) against 63.9/100 (Grade C), a 3.3-point gap. DeerFlow leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.
An open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.
Choose DeerFlow if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +4.5Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 8%
- +0.8Adoption: 84.9k GitHub stars against 37.5k
"Vibe-Trading: Your Personal Trading Agent"
Vibe-Trading doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DeerFlow and Vibe-Trading, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | DeerFlowbytedance/deer-flow | Vibe-TradingHKUDS/Vibe-Trading |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 67.2 | 63.9 |
| Evidence grade | B | C |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #443 | #555 |
| Rank in Research & Data | #8 | #12 |
| GitHub stars | 84.9k | 37.5k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.5 / 10 | 6.6 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 13.1 | 8.6 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 11.8 | 11.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 6 — E2B, OpenAI, OpenRouter, … | 4 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, OpenAI, … |
| Requires API keys | Yes | Yes |
| Plugin surface | extensions | — |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →