Registry › Compare › DeerFlow vs Unstructured

DeerFlow vs Unstructured

Unstructured leads on trust: 89.2/100 (Grade A) against 67.2/100 (Grade B), a 22.0-point gap. Unstructured leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

B DeerFlow 67.2

An open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.

bytedance/deer-flow · #443 overall · #8 Research & Data · coverage C (2/5)

DeerFlow doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Unstructured 89.2

Convert documents to structured data effortlessly. Unstructured is open-source ETL solution for transforming complex documents into clean, structured formats for language models. Visit our website to learn more about our enterprise grade Platform product for production grade workflows…

Unstructured-IO/unstructured · #36 overall · #1 Research & Data · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Unstructured if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.8Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.7 against 6.5
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.0Adoption
A vs CEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

13.1

Safety / IntegrityUnstructured +7.8

20.9

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceUnstructured +7.2

18.0

14.0

TransparencyUnstructured +0.2

14.2

19.9

MaintenanceDeerFlow +0.2

19.7

11.8

AdoptionUnstructured +6.0

17.8

-2.4

Runtime calibrationUnstructured +1.0

-1.4

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DeerFlow and Unstructured, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	DeerFlowbytedance/deer-flow	UnstructuredUnstructured-IO/unstructured
HVTrust score	67.2	89.2
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	C	A
Overall rank	#443	#36
Rank in Research & Data	#8	#1
GitHub stars	84.9k	15.7k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.5 / 10	6.7 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	582k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.1	20.9
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.0	14.2
Maintenance / 20	19.9	19.7
Adoption / 20	11.8	17.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	6 — E2B, OpenAI, OpenRouter, …	7 — Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	extensions	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → DeerFlow profile Unstructured profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →