DeerFlow vs Docling
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of DeerFlow and Docling, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Docling leads on trust — 86.7/100 (Grade A) vs 65.8/100 (Grade B), a 20.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | DeerFlowbytedance/deer-flow | Doclingdocling-project/docling |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 65.8 | 86.7 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | C | A |
| Overall rank | #147 | #25 |
| Rank in Research & Data | #7 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 79.3k | 64.2k |
| Last updated | today | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.5 / 10 | 4.8 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | — | 4.1M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 13.1 | 17.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.0 | 12.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 11.8 | 20.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 7 — E2B, Firecrawl, OpenAI, … | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, OpenAI, Postgres |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | marketplace | extensions |
| Provenance drift | — | Unknown |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →