Deepsec vs REA
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Deepsec and REA, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
REA leads on trust — 70.5/100 (Grade B) vs 59.7/100 (Grade C), a 10.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Deepsecvercel-labs/deepsec | REAmorluto/rea |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 59.7 | 70.5 |
| Evidence grade | C | B |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #335 | #135 |
| Rank in Security & Guardrails | #8 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 6.7k | 167 |
| Last updated | 3d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.6 / 10 | — |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | — | 528/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.0 | 9.7 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 8.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 14.4 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →