RegistryCompare › Deepsec vs NeMo Guardrails

Deepsec vs NeMo Guardrails

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Deepsec and NeMo Guardrails, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

NeMo Guardrails leads on trust — 70.4/100 (Grade B) vs 58.3/100 (Grade C), a 12.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Deepsecvercel-labs/deepsec NeMo GuardrailsNVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails
HVTrust score 58.3 70.4
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #241 #104
Rank in Security & Guardrails #7 #2
GitHub stars 6.5k 6.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 5.9 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 79k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.0 12.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.5
Maintenance / 20 14.3 18.9
Adoption / 20 9.2 15.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Deepsec profile NeMo Guardrails profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →