RegistryCompare › Deepsec vs NeMo Guardrails

Deepsec vs NeMo Guardrails

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Deepsec and NeMo Guardrails, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

NeMo Guardrails leads on trust — 72.0/100 (Grade B) vs 59.9/100 (Grade C), a 12.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Deepsecvercel-labs/deepsec NeMo GuardrailsNVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails
HVTrust score 59.9 72.0
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #333 #120
Rank in Security & Guardrails #8 #3
GitHub stars 7.5k 7.0k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 6.4 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 79k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.0 13.0
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.9
Maintenance / 20 14.5 18.5
Adoption / 20 9.3 15.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Deepsec profile NeMo Guardrails profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →