RegistryCompare › Deepsec vs NeMo Guardrails

Deepsec vs NeMo Guardrails

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Deepsec and NeMo Guardrails, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

NeMo Guardrails leads on trust — 72.6/100 (Grade B) vs 57.7/100 (Grade C), a 14.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Deepsecvercel-labs/deepsec NeMo GuardrailsNVIDIA/NeMo-Guardrails
HVTrust score 57.7 72.6
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #265 #106
Rank in Security & Guardrails #5 #2
GitHub stars 8.0k 7.2k
Last updated 5d ago 3d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 7.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 114k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.1 13.9
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.7 14.5
Maintenance / 20 13.7 17.4
Adoption / 20 9.4 16.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Deepsec profile NeMo Guardrails profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →