RegistryCompare › Deepsec vs Guardrails AI

Deepsec vs Guardrails AI

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Deepsec and Guardrails AI, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Guardrails AI leads on trust — 82.6/100 (Grade A) vs 58.3/100 (Grade C), a 24.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Deepsecvercel-labs/deepsec Guardrails AIguardrails-ai/guardrails
HVTrust score 58.3 82.6
Evidence grade C A
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #241 #51
Rank in Security & Guardrails #7 #1
GitHub stars 6.5k 7.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 6.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 41k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.0 20.0
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.6
Maintenance / 20 14.3 17.4
Adoption / 20 9.2 15.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Deepsec profile Guardrails AI profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →