RegistryCompare › Daytona vs OpenSandbox

Daytona vs OpenSandbox

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Daytona and OpenSandbox, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Daytona leads on trust — 70.8/100 (Grade B) vs 25.8/100 (Grade D), a 45.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Daytonadaytonaio/daytona OpenSandboxopensandbox-group/OpenSandbox
HVTrust score 70.8 25.8
Evidence grade B D
Coverage grade A D
Overall rank #98 #384
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #3 #4
GitHub stars 72.2k 12.0k
Last updated 6d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 132k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.6 2.1
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.0 8.5
Maintenance / 20 18.4 19.9
Adoption / 20 18.5 9.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis 1 — Redis
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → Daytona profile OpenSandbox profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →