RegistryCompare › Daytona vs E2B

Daytona vs E2B

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Daytona and E2B, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

E2B leads on trust — 74.3/100 (Grade B) vs 73.9/100 (Grade B), a 0.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Daytonadaytonaio/daytona E2Be2b-dev/e2b
HVTrust score 73.9 74.3
Evidence grade B B
Overall rank #60 #56
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #2 #1
GitHub stars 72.3k 12.8k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10 6.2 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 132k/wk 982k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.6 11.9
Identity & provenance / 20 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.0 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 18.5 17.8
Open in the live compare tool → Daytona profile E2B profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v3.2 →