RegistryCompare › Cua vs Peekaboo

Cua vs Peekaboo

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cua and Peekaboo, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Peekaboo leads on trust — 74.7/100 (Grade B) vs 74.5/100 (Grade B), a 0.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Cuatrycua/cua Peekabooopenclaw/Peekaboo
HVTrust score 74.5 74.7
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #112 #108
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #9 #8
GitHub stars 21.9k 5.1k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 11k/wk 2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.6 11.4
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.8 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 15.8 13.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Cua profile Peekaboo profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →