RegistryCompare › Crawl4AI vs Docling

Crawl4AI vs Docling

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Crawl4AI and Docling, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Docling leads on trust — 88.6/100 (Grade A) vs 64.3/100 (Grade C), a 24.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Crawl4AIunclecode/crawl4ai Doclingdocling-project/docling
HVTrust score 64.3 88.6
Evidence grade C A
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #251 #22
Rank in Research & Data #7 #1
GitHub stars 78.6k 65.1k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10 4.7 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 390k/wk 4.1M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 7.8 17.7
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.9 12.5
Maintenance / 20 11.9 19.8
Adoption / 20 19.2 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface marketplace plugins
Provenance drift Match Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Crawl4AI profile Docling profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →