RegistryCompare › Crawl4AI vs DeerFlow

Crawl4AI vs DeerFlow

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Crawl4AI and DeerFlow, two Research & Data projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Crawl4AI leads on trust — 68.5/100 (Grade B) vs 65.8/100 (Grade B), a 2.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Crawl4AIunclecode/crawl4ai DeerFlowbytedance/deer-flow
HVTrust score 68.5 65.8
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade A C
Overall rank #122 #147
Rank in Research & Data #6 #7
GitHub stars 76.1k 79.3k
Last updated 5d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10 6.5 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 437k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 7.8 13.1
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.9 14.0
Maintenance / 20 17.8 20.0
Adoption / 20 19.2 11.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Implemented
External providers 2 — OpenAI, Redis 7 — E2B, Firecrawl, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface marketplace marketplace
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Crawl4AI profile DeerFlow profile More Research & Data →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →