RegistryCompare › Container Use vs OpenSandbox

Container Use vs OpenSandbox

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Container Use and OpenSandbox, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

OpenSandbox leads on trust — 74.4/100 (Grade B) vs 56.5/100 (Grade C), a 17.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Container Usedagger/container-use OpenSandboxopensandbox-group/OpenSandbox
HVTrust score 56.5 74.4
Evidence grade C B
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #274 #93
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #7 #3
GitHub stars 4.0k 15.4k
Last updated 7d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10 6.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 95k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.9 8.6
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.6 13.7
Maintenance / 20 11.5 20.0
Adoption / 20 8.7 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 2 — Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Container Use profile OpenSandbox profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →