Container Use vs E2B
E2B leads on trust: 77.7/100 (Grade B) against 55.5/100 (Grade C), a 22.2-point gap. E2B leads on maintenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.
Development environments for coding agents. Enable multiple agents to work safely and independently with your preferred stack.
Container Use doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Open-source, secure environment with real-world tools for enterprise-grade agents.
Choose E2B if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +9.6Adoption: 14.3k GitHub stars against 4.1k
- +8.5Maintenance: last push today, against 22d ago
- +1.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 4.8
- +1.4Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 4.8
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Container Use and E2B, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Container Usedagger/container-use | E2Be2b-dev/e2b |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 55.5 | 77.7 |
| Evidence grade | C | B |
| Coverage grade | C | A |
| Overall rank | #806 | #201 |
| Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes | #7 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 4.1k | 14.3k |
| Last updated | 22d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.8 / 10 | 6.8 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | 1.7M/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.9 | 12.3 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.6 | 14.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 10.5 | 19.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 8.7 | 18.3 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Declared |
| External providers | — | 1 — E2B |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →