RegistryCompare › Container Use vs Daytona

Container Use vs Daytona

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Container Use and Daytona, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Daytona leads on trust — 70.8/100 (Grade B) vs 23.4/100 (Grade D), a 47.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Container Usedagger/container-use Daytonadaytonaio/daytona
HVTrust score 23.4 70.8
Evidence grade D B
Coverage grade D A
Overall rank #395 #98
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #6 #3
GitHub stars 3.9k 72.2k
Last updated 33d ago 6d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Downloads 132k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 5.0 11.6
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 8.5 13.0
Maintenance / 20 9.8 18.4
Adoption / 20 8.6 18.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → Container Use profile Daytona profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →