Container Use vs Daytona
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Container Use and Daytona, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Daytona leads on trust — 67.3/100 (Grade B) vs 59.8/100 (Grade C), a 7.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Container Usedagger/container-use | Daytonadaytonaio/daytona |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 59.8 | 67.3 |
| Evidence grade | C | B |
| Coverage grade | C | A |
| Overall rank | #383 | #217 |
| Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes | #5 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 4.0k | 71.9k |
| Last updated | 12d ago | 36d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 4.8 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Downloads | — | 220k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.9 | 12.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.6 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 14.8 | 9.6 |
| Adoption / 20 | 8.7 | 18.8 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | — | Unknown |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →