Registry › Compare › Concordia vs TradingAgents

Concordia vs TradingAgents

Both are Grade B and 1.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Concordia leads on transparency; TradingAgents leads on maintenance and adoption.

B Concordia 67.4

A library for generative social simulation

google-deepmind/concordia · #431 overall · #6 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Concordia if transparency matters most.

+2.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.8 against 4.8

B TradingAgents 66.0

TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework

TauricResearch/TradingAgents · #477 overall · #7 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose TradingAgents if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+4.0Adoption: 111.6k GitHub stars against 1.8k
+1.3Maintenance
+1.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 5%

Where they differ

10.0

Safety / IntegrityTradingAgents +1.0

11.0

15.1

TransparencyConcordia +2.5

12.6

18.6

MaintenanceTradingAgents +1.3

19.9

11.7

AdoptionTradingAgents +4.0

15.7

+1.2

Runtime calibrationConcordia +5.2

-4.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Concordia and TradingAgents, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia	TradingAgentsTauricResearch/TradingAgents
HVTrust score	67.4	66.0
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#431	#477
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#6	#7
GitHub stars	1.8k	111.6k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	7.8 / 10	4.8 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	760/wk	480/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.0	11.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	15.1	12.6
Maintenance / 20	18.6	19.9
Adoption / 20	11.7	15.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …	8 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Concordia profile TradingAgents profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →