Registry › Compare › Concordia vs Swarms

Concordia vs Swarms

Swarms leads on trust: 72.9/100 (Grade B) against 66.7/100 (Grade B), a 6.2-point gap. Concordia leads on transparency; Swarms leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

B Concordia 66.7

A library for generative social simulation

google-deepmind/concordia · #449 overall · #6 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Concordia if transparency matters most.

+1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.8 against 6.0

B Swarms 72.9

The Enterprise-Grade Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework. Website: https://swarms.ai

kyegomez/swarms · #293 overall · #3 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Swarms if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+2.5Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 5%
+2.0Adoption: 1.6k weekly downloads against 627
+1.9Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

Where they differ

10.0

Safety / IntegritySwarms +2.5

12.5

15.1

TransparencyConcordia +1.5

13.6

18.1

MaintenanceSwarms +1.9

20.0

11.5

AdoptionSwarms +2.0

13.5

+1.2

Runtime calibrationSwarms +1.3

+2.5

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Concordia and Swarms, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia	Swarmskyegomez/swarms
HVTrust score	66.7	72.9
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#449	#293
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#6	#3
GitHub stars	1.8k	7.2k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	7.8 / 10	6.0 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	627/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.0	12.5
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	15.1	13.6
Maintenance / 20	18.1	20.0
Adoption / 20	11.5	13.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …	4 — Anthropic, Groq, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	marketplace
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Concordia profile Swarms profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →