Registry › Compare › Concordia vs Rakazo

Concordia vs Rakazo

Both are Grade B and 3.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Concordia leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; Rakazo leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance. Note: Rakazo's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage C vs B) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

B Concordia 66.2

A library for generative social simulation

google-deepmind/concordia · #489 overall · #6 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Concordia if adoption matters most.

+2.3Adoption
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

B Rakazo 69.7

Open-source Grok Bot alternative. Choose your own model and sandbox.

elie222/rakazo · #388 overall · #5 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Rakazo if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+4.6Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 7%
+2.3Maintenance: last push today, against 6d ago

Where they differ

9.8

Safety / IntegrityRakazo +4.6

14.4

15.0

TransparencyConcordia +0.1

14.9

17.7

MaintenanceRakazo +2.3

20.0

11.7

AdoptionConcordia +2.3

9.4

+1.2

Runtime calibrationConcordia +1.0

+0.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Concordia and Rakazo, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia	Rakazoelie222/rakazo
HVTrust score	66.2	69.7
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#489	#388
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#6	#5
GitHub stars	1.9k	8.4k
Last updated	6d ago	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	7.6 / 10	7.5 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	769/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.8	14.4
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	15.0	14.9
Maintenance / 20	17.7	20.0
Adoption / 20	11.7	9.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …	2 — OpenRouter, Postgres
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Concordia profile Rakazo profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →