Concordia vs Rakazo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Concordia and Rakazo, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Concordia leads on trust — 65.2/100 (Grade B) vs 64.3/100 (Grade C), a 0.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia | Rakazoelie222/rakazo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 65.2 | 64.3 |
| Evidence grade | B | C |
| Coverage grade | B | C |
| Overall rank | #314 | #332 |
| Rank in Multi-Agent Systems | #5 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 1.7k | 1.9k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.9 / 10 | 5.7 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 570/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.0 | 12.1 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 15.2 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 16.6 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 11.4 | 7.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, … | 2 — E2B, OpenRouter |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →