Registry › Compare › Concordia vs OpenMausBot

Concordia vs OpenMausBot

OpenMausBot leads on trust: 83.8/100 (Grade A) against 66.7/100 (Grade B), a 17.1-point gap. Concordia leads on transparency; OpenMausBot leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.

B Concordia 66.7

A library for generative social simulation

google-deepmind/concordia · #449 overall · #6 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Concordia if transparency matters most.

+3.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.8 against 4.2

A OpenMausBot 83.8

Open-source Grok Bot alternative with a virtual machine that bots can use

milind-soni/OpenMausBot · #107 overall · #2 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenMausBot if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+4.4Safety / Integrity: 33% of recent commits signed, against 5%
+1.9Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago
+1.8Adoption: 2.3k weekly downloads against 627

Where they differ

10.0

Safety / IntegrityOpenMausBot +4.4

14.4

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceOpenMausBot +7.2

18.0

15.1

TransparencyConcordia +3.0

12.1

18.1

MaintenanceOpenMausBot +1.9

20.0

11.5

AdoptionOpenMausBot +1.8

13.3

+1.2

Runtime calibrationOpenMausBot +4.8

+6.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Concordia and OpenMausBot, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia	OpenMausBotmilind-soni/OpenMausBot
HVTrust score	66.7	83.8
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#449	#107
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#6	#2
GitHub stars	1.8k	4.7k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.8 / 10	4.2 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	627/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	10.0	14.4
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	15.1	12.1
Maintenance / 20	18.1	20.0
Adoption / 20	11.5	13.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Concordia profile OpenMausBot profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →